Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • # SFC Agreement === SFC Agreement ===
    1 KB (201 words) - 13:31, 1 March 2012
  • # SFC agreement === SFC agreement ===
    2 KB (266 words) - 16:25, 9 May 2012
  • ...s and the SFC has been approved; the only outstanding issue is getting the agreement signed by the oversight board. Our SFC contact is karen AT softwarefreedom. ...ntention was the value of risk mitigation vs. the cost of implementing the agreement. We agreed to seek guidance from SFC before moving forward.
    3 KB (548 words) - 09:37, 1 March 2011
  • in agreement, but we would like to wait for the other board members for formal agreement.
    2 KB (352 words) - 15:12, 2 July 2020
  • effectively, until such time when a trademark policy, agreement, and
    2 KB (337 words) - 00:28, 2 March 2011
  • * Finalize SFC agreement :''Moving ahead, but still waiting for final agreement from SFC for the OB to sign.''
    3 KB (364 words) - 09:36, 1 March 2011
  • * departure is defined in the agreement with the Conservancy, ...new organization, with the ultimate goal being termination of the existing agreement between Sugar Labs and the SFC
    2 KB (268 words) - 05:06, 23 May 2019
  • * SF Conservancy [[Sugar Labs/SFC Fiscal Agreement]]
    2 KB (343 words) - 01:47, 12 August 2011
  • Chihurumnaya Ibiam: Yeah that was the earlier agreement and he also hasn't reviewed recent draft PRs, been busy I guess.
    6 KB (1,004 words) - 07:32, 15 April 2021
  • ...the [[Sugar_Labs/SFC_Fiscal_Agreement|Software Freedom Conservancy Fiscal Agreement]], because such terms bind our behavior as Sugar Labs Oversight Board and a ...se note the Project Management, Communications and Activities terms in the agreement provide that:
    14 KB (2,215 words) - 21:42, 22 September 2017
  • :'''kaametza''': walter, I understand the SFC agreement is supposed to enable SL to get in contractual relationships
    25 KB (4,043 words) - 15:32, 2 December 2011
  • ...ugar can be marketed effectively, until such time when a trademark policy, agreement, and process is put in place: SoaS will be the first project to go through
    11 KB (1,787 words) - 01:04, 2 March 2011
  • ...e *finally* approved as members. The only outstanding issue is getting the agreement signed by the oversight board :'''<walter_>''' contributor agreement. The point of contention was the value of risk
    39 KB (7,263 words) - 09:35, 1 March 2011
  • # There is a [[Sugar_Labs/SFC_Fiscal_Agreement|Fiscal Agreement]] all SLOB members need to file with the SFC
    5 KB (707 words) - 11:54, 9 January 2013
  • ...no-one wakes up thinking "I wish I had to enter into a trademark licensing agreement today". ...: we've already spoken will all of those... and as soon as we have our own agreement as to our policy, it is a cookie-cutter process to finalize
    37 KB (6,610 words) - 00:12, 2 March 2011
  • :'''<walterbender>''' Aren't we all in agreement here?
    23 KB (4,059 words) - 23:56, 1 March 2011
  • ;AGREED MOTION 2019-17: we execute an agreement to engage with Kyle Mitchell, attorney, for the purposes of setting up a 50 ...new organization, with the ultimate goal being termination of the existing agreement between Sugar Labs and the SFC.
    50 KB (7,772 words) - 16:47, 11 November 2020
  • ...you added both the previous and the current proposal so yeah, the earlier agreement was to focus on the first 15 of the list and so far I've opened two PRs and
    18 KB (2,942 words) - 17:58, 31 March 2021
  • a template agreement worked out with the SFC and the prior approval of
    20 KB (3,239 words) - 22:41, 6 June 2016
  • :'''<cjb>''' so I suspect we are mostly in agreement that includes/sweetened by should be unprotected?
    21 KB (3,691 words) - 23:32, 1 March 2011

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)