Difference between revisions of "Development Team/Meetings"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (fix calendar)
 
(144 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<noinclude>{{ GoogleTrans-en | es =show | bg =show | zh-CN =show | zh-TW =show | hr =show | cs =show | da =show | nl =show | fi =show | fr =show | de =show | el =show | hi =show | it =show | ja =show | ko =show | no =show | pl =show | pt =show | ro =show | ru =show | sv =show }}{{TeamHeader|DevelopmentTeam}}</noinclude>
+
<noinclude>{{TeamHeader|Development Team|roadmap_link={{Upcoming Stable Release}}/Roadmap}}__NOTOC__
−
__NOTOC__
+
[[Category:Development Team]]
−
<div style="font-size: 1.3em; background: #edfdd7; padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #cde7a8">The Development team will be holding regular bi-weekly meetings on ?? at ?? UTC on irc.freenode.net (channel: #sugar-meeting). Please add to the agenda below and please join in with your ideas.
+
[[Category:Meetings]]
 +
[[Category:Meeting minutes]]
 +
</noinclude>
  
−
Hint: You can use an [http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html online time calculator] to convert from UTC to your local time zone or back.
+
== Development Team Meetings ==
−
</div>
 
  
−
===Upcoming Agenda===
+
=== Who ===
  
−
==About==
+
The meeting is targeted to Sugar core and activity developers, but everyone interested is welcome to join. We try to open the development up a bit, make it more transparent and allow the community to participate easily.
 +
 
 +
=== Default Agenda ===
  
 
* Quick update about what we have been working on and eventually the problems we have run into.
 
* Quick update about what we have been working on and eventually the problems we have run into.
Line 15: Line 18:
 
* Help out new contributors to figure out where to start. Point out the tickets we need help with, discuss with them the implementation.
 
* Help out new contributors to figure out where to start. Point out the tickets we need help with, discuss with them the implementation.
  
−
==Who==
+
=== How to add to the agenda ===
 +
 
 +
Add the topics that you want to discuss during the week to the upcoming meeting. They will be collected during the week and seny out in the meeting announcement on Tuesday morning.
 +
 
 +
== Upcoming Meetings ==
 +
 
 +
=== Tuesday 21:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
* what we have been working on,
 +
 
 +
== Previous Meetings ==
 +
 
 +
=== 10th April 2018 21:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-04-10T21:00:09.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-04-10T21:00:09 log]
 +
[http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2018-April/055264.html summary]
 +
 
 +
last planned update of this page, as no feedback was received.
  
−
The meeting is mainly targeted to Sugar core and activity developers, but everyone interested is welcome to join. It's primary purpose is to try to open the development up a bit, make it more transparent and allow the community to participate more easily. For when to join see 'When and Where'.
+
=== 3rd April 2018 21:00 UTC ===
  
−
==How to add topics==
+
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-04-03T21:01:13.html minutes]
−
You can add the topics that you want to discuss during the week to the topics section for the meeting. They will be collected during the week and send out in the meeting announcement on Thursday morning.
+
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-04-03T21:01:13 log]
 +
[http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2018-April/055259.html summary]
 +
 
 +
=== 27th March 2018 21:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-03-27T21:00:07.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-03-27T21:00:07 log]
 +
[http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2018-March/055249.html summary]
 +
 
 +
=== 20th March 2018 21:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-03-20T21:00:08.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-03-20T21:00:08 log]
 +
[http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2018-March/055189.html summary]
 +
 
 +
=== 13th March 2018 21:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-03-13T21:00:13.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-03-13T21:00:13 log]
 +
[http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2018-March/055158.html summary]
 +
 
 +
relevance canary; are you reading this?  the regular updates here will cease in another four weeks unless there is some feedback; updates will continue on sugar-devel@ mailing list.
 +
 
 +
=== 6th March 2018 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-03-06T22:00:07.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-03-06T22:00:07 log]
 +
[http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2018-March/055143.html summary]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:Music Blocks release, hosting.  Reviewing patches.  Replacement of Record activity.  Porting to  Six and Python 3.  Porting activities to GTK+ 3 and Sugargame 1.2.
 +
;port to Python 3 and Six:expectations discussed, Q&A session, see summary and log.
 +
;general business:continuous integration, see summary and log.
 +
 
 +
=== 27th February 2018 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-02-27T22:00:09.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-02-27T22:00:09 log]
 +
[http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2018-February/055112.html summary]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:Bugs in Music Blocks, Speak, Memorize.  Porting activities to GTK+ 3 and Sugargame 1.2.
 +
;port to Python 3 and Six:plans made and discussed, see summary and log.
 +
;general business:see summary and log.
 +
 
 +
=== 20th February 2018 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-02-20T22:00:16.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-02-20T22:00:16 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:testing Sugar on Ubuntu 18.04, testing and design of Music Blocks.
 +
 
 +
=== 14th January 2018 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-02-13T22:00:09.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-02-13T22:00:09 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:quashing Music Blocks bugs, preparing tasks for GSoC, project mining, clean up activity metadata format, moved more of developer.sugarlabs.org over to GitHub.
 +
 
 +
=== 30th January 2018 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-01-30T22:00:08.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-01-30T22:00:08 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:review patches, review activity NumRush, port Letters and Physics to Sugargame 1.2, a contributors page for web site, Music Blocks planet, preparing new release, pitch visualisation, Clock activity user documentation, and creating tasks for GSoC.
 +
 
 +
=== 16th January 2018 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-01-16T22:00:08.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-01-16T22:00:08 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:fix startup delay in Sugargame, add ticking Clock, and a music blocks planet project moderation portal.
 +
;progress of GCI 2017:productive and enriching, last day today, opportunity for new activity maintainers to release contributed work.
 +
 
 +
=== 9th January 2018 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-01-09T22:00:07.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-01-09T22:00:07 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:patch reviews, patch tests, measure and clock activities, music blocks in browse, teaching humanitarian free and open source software.
 +
;progress of GCI 2017: GTK+ 3 conversions, documentation updates.
 +
 
 +
=== 2nd January 2018 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-01-02T22:33:17.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2018-01-02T22:33:17 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:reviewing patches, updating translations,
 +
;progress of GCI 2017: GTK+ 3 conversions,
 +
 
 +
=== 19th December 2017 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-12-19T22:00:40.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-12-19T22:00:40 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:testing Sugar 0.112 on Fedora 18 and Ubuntu 18.04, answering questions on Sugar 0.112 release, a lot of bug fixes being reviewed.
 +
;progress of GCI 2017:students are starting to dig deeper, documentation for sugar-live-build has come together, some GTK+ 3 porting tasks coming up.
 +
 
 +
=== 12th December 2017 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-12-12T22:00:08.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-12-12T22:00:08 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:Walter has been administering [[Google Code In 2017|GCI 2017]], and working on Music Blocks and Turtle Blocks. James has been reviewing pull requests, checking licensing, testing Sugar on Ubuntu 18.04 beta, releasing Speak-55 and Read-118.1, and fixed a Paint activity empty canvas.
 +
;progress of GCI 2017:Almost 400 students, how to make a pull request, some solid contributions, some new activities.
 +
;cross-platform development:There are broken JavaScript activities that don't run on Sugar desktop.  Contributions are being wasted, and opportunity lost.  We had a Cross-Platform environment.  We have attracted JavaScript Web developers instead of JavaScript Cross-Platform developers.  We need Cross-Platform developers to merge the diverged libraries, and apply Cross-Platform practices to both libraries and activities.
 +
 
 +
=== 5th December 2017 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
Only one developer was available, so the meeting did not happen.
 +
 
 +
=== 28th November 2017 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
Only one developer was available, so the meeting did not happen.
 +
 
 +
=== 21st November 2017 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-11-21T22:00:17.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-11-21T22:00:17 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:Abdul has been working on an activity for Sugarizer.  Walter has been working on Google Code-in preparation and released Music Blocks 2.2.  James has been testing Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic in a VM, Fedora 27 SoaS on Raspberry Pi, and plans to write guidance for pull requests by GCI contestants.
 +
 
 +
=== 14th November 2017 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-11-14T22:00:08.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-11-14T22:00:08 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:About 308 GCI tasks have been defined privately by the mentors, Music Blocks source code has been prepared for GCI, Sugar Software Update has been tested; a rogue Browse-157.4 bundle was found, several GitHub issues cleaned in preparation for GCI.
 +
 
 +
=== 7th November 2017 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-11-07T22:00:15.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-11-07T22:00:15 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:preparing for GCI, merged several translation pull requests, began looking into why Sugar POT file is generated differently, released and tested Browse 201.3 native, reviewed Paraguay's build of sugar, reviewed Arch Linux packaging of Sugar, thinking of updating a beginners guide, merging www-sugar, and Music Blocks.
 +
 
 +
=== 31st October 2017 21:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-10-31T20:59:07.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-10-31T20:59:07 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:nothing in particular.
 +
;how to encourage testing of Fedora packagers' work:Thomas and Frederick found fail-to-start problems in Fedora 27, as the Sugar and Browse packages had not been tested at all, so we all need to test the work of our downstream packagers, and help them where possible.
 +
 
 +
=== 24th October 2017 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-10-24T22:00:08.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-10-24T22:00:08 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:updating [https://github.com/walterbender/musicblocks/tree/master/examples examples] and testing of Music Blocks, testing new WebKit GTK+ with Browse, looking for source code commits for the FindWords-3.1 activity, and releasing [https://github.com/godiard/music-keyboard-activity/commit/67b879d5a3f5b24ba1098086570e7bdb84d7a0da MusicKeyboard-11].
 +
 
 +
=== 17th October 2017 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-10-17T22:00:08.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-10-17T22:00:08 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;what we have been working on:features in Music Blocks, assessing GTK+ 3 porting, preparing for and merging translations,
 +
;impact of GTK+ 2 removal in Fedora and Debian:GTK+ is a library, see [https://www.gtk.org/ GTK+] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTK%2B GTK+], GTK+ 3 is incompatible with GTK+ 2, many activities for Sugar depend on GTK+ 2, GTK+ 2 is scheduled for removal in Fedora 28 and in Debian Buster, removal already starting in Debian, bad user experience with Browse and activities.sugarlabs.org is non-starting activities, all Fructose activities are converted, Labyrinth is of interest to OLPC and has an upstream port, Record is of interest to OLPC and has an in-progress port at https://github.com/quozl/record-activity/tree/gtk3, Moon is of interest to OLPC and has a JavaScript port, GCI will have porting tasks.
 +
 
 +
=== 10th October 2017 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
Only one developer was available, so the meeting did not happen.
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;post-release [[0.112]] review:no test reports received.
 +
;what we have been working on:new gst-plugins-espeak, contributors list, releasing, testing [[0.112]], font size in Terminal, bugs in gst-plugins-espeak.
 +
 
 +
Report was made [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2017-October/054837.html by mail].
 +
 
 +
=== 3rd October 2017 22:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
Only one developer was available, so the meeting did not happen.
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;progress of testing 0.111:going well, and a bootable build is available.
 +
;merging any translations:no new translations, so no need for merge.
 +
;readiness for 0.112:release notes are complete, nothing is blocking release on 9th October.
 +
;what we have been working on:Memorize and Speak activities do fail to start on Ubuntu 17.04 Artful due to default voice missing from espeak, since fixed in gst-plugins-espeak.  sugar-docs has been updated for using sugar-live-build as a development environment, and remove sugar-build.  The AbiWord fix for #4915 Write activity flicker has been accepted by Ubuntu and Debian, and has tested fine in those distributions.  Also on GitHub have been commits in embedded Music Blocks, embedded Turtle Blocks, Help, and ImageViewer.
 +
 
 +
Report was made [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2017-October/054829.html by mail].
 +
 
 +
=== 26 September 2017 22:00 UTC ===
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-09-26T22:00:07.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-09-26T22:00:07 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
;progress of testing 0.111:some testing is being done, but more testing would be helpful, see [[0.112#Testing|testing 0.111]],
 +
;merging latest translations:asked translators mailing list, no new translations made, strings for save-as feature are new, some Music Blocks strings changed too,
 +
;readiness for 0.112:some time before translations must be in per [[0.112/Roadmap|schedule]], release process well understood and should not take long, possibility of a test image,
 +
;what we have been working on: bug [https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4915 #4915 ("Write redraws excessively - heats my lap")] the AbiWord flicker, a fix is available, but upstream wants it also fixed on Wayland, though Ubuntu [https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/1574278 has taken it], applying the fix is straightfoward; release notes are to include Turtle Blocks porting, and therefore other activities (done, see [[0.112#Notes]]), Turtle Blocks 216 for upload (done), and a test image is nearly complete, which can be a replacement for sugar-build, see [[0.112#Testing|Sugar Live Build]].
 +
 
 +
=== 19 September 2017 21:00 UTC ===
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-09-19T21:01:38.html minutes]
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-09-19T21:01:38 log]
 +
 
 +
Topics:
 +
 
 +
;Release Manager: We ack'd James Cameron in his role as release manager for 0.112.
 +
;Community Standards: We reiterated the importance of civil behavior and the necessity to work with the community, not unilaterally. We also reviewed the mechanisms we use for pull requests, reviews, and merging.
 +
;0.112 release testing: We discussed [[0.112/Testing]]
 +
;Version numbering: We agreed to investigate the possibility of switching to 113 for the next release (a monotonic numbering system).
 +
;ALSOv3: We agreed to work with SCG to do the ground work necessary to get ALSOv3 launched.
 +
 
 +
=== 30 October 2010 22:00 UTC ===
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2010-10-30T22:06:36.html minutes],
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2010-10-30T22:06:36 log]
 +
 
 +
Not discussed:
 +
 
 +
* Settle down patch submitting workflow:
 +
** email based workflow as a primarily model (check other FOSS projects to gather all existed experience) [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:35, 27 October 2010 (EDT)
 +
** write an email-bot/trac-plugin to make an email<->trac sync. Will be useful, e.g., for non-developers who track bugs status and to let people know the current status in most convenient way. All emails, w/ ticket set, will be posted to bugs.sl.o and any comments(and patches) to bugs.sl.o, to tickets w/ previously sent patches, will be emailed. [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:35, 27 October 2010 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
* Requirement to use pylint/pep8 in git pre-commit:
 +
** [[Platform_Team/Sugar_Lint|sugar-lint]], because it is a standalone project and can be used as-is also, e.g., for activities (i.e., as unified lint tool within sugar doers) [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:39, 27 October 2010 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
* Increase a level of trust within core team, make patch reviewing workflow more clear:
 +
** Any committer, to a particular core project, might be a reviewer (we either should trust all these people or drop them from committer list) [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:59, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
 +
** To accept ''regular'' (reviewer decides whether patches are regular or not, of course, better to discuss it with other committers if there are doubts) patches, only one reviewer is needed [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:59, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
 +
** Non-regular patches should be formed in [[Features]]. These patches might take several tens of K. This is by design; that it is hard not only to develop, but also to review and it should involve several committers for a reasonable amount of time. [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 09:28, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
 +
** Review process should not include debates about coding style, if coding style conforms to lint checks and Hacking Policy (if it has unequivocal statements, needs to be rechecked), it should be applied [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 09:33, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
 +
** Purism is good but there is no need to achieve it by single patch, it might be changed in post-commit patches if second reviewer (e.g., looking to the patch thread on mailing list) found an issue in already commited code. [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 13:39, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
* officially dropping support for 0.86? (e.g. {{bug|1838}})
 +
** do we need to discuss thing like that on Development Team meeting, is it a more appropriate task for Deployment and Platform teams? [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:59, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
* big (and small) ideas for 0.92  --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 13:17, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
* Support [[Platform_Team/Guide/Core_development|isolated]] start of glucose components. In that case, merge sugar-base to sugar-toolkit ([http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-October/028196.html patches] [yet] don't implement it but import sugar-base from sugar-toolkit) to have API that will be used as a single access point to sugar core functionality for activities. [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 08:12, 30 October 2010 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
=== Wednesday 30 June 2010 13:00 UTC===
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2010-06-30T09:01:00.html minutes],
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2010-06-30 log]
 +
* Introduction: the release cycle approach
 +
* Define the overall goal for 0.90
 +
* Review processes (review, Feature)
 +
* Open positions (development team, design team, testing team)
 +
 
 +
=== Monday 22 March 2010 14:00 UTC ===
 +
[http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100322_1010.html minutes], [http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.log.20100322_1010.html log].
 +
* Welcome newcomers
 +
* 0.88 Release: hard code freeze, final release, 0.88.1
 +
 
 +
=== Monday 8 March 2010 14:00 UTC ===
 +
[http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100308_0915.html minutes], [http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.log.20100308_0915.html log].
 +
* backport [http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1787 SL#1787] to 0.86, push out + announce new release
 +
* 0.88 Release: bug database cleanup, code review, stabilization, etc
 +
 
 +
=== Monday 22 February 2010 14:00 UTC ===
 +
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100222_0902.html minutes], [http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.log.20100222_0902.html log].
 +
* 0.88 Release: bug database cleanup, fix bugs, etc
 +
* Activity Team: Move to new toolbar
 +
 
 +
=== Monday 8 February 2010 14:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
==== Logs ====
 +
[http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.log.20100208_0908.html logs]
 +
 
 +
[http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100208_0908.html minutes]
 +
 
 +
==== Topics ====
 +
 
 +
* State of 0.88 release
 +
 
 +
<div class="NavFrame collapsed"><div class="NavHead">
 +
 
 +
== 2009 Meetings ==
 +
</div><div class="NavContent">
 +
=== Thursday 10 September 2009 14:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
==== Logs ====
 +
[[Development Team/Meetings/Logs/September 10 2009]]
 +
 
 +
==== Topics ====
 +
 
 +
* Improving testing, triaging and bugfixing
 +
** test plans
 +
** testing meetings
 +
** triaging
 +
* Fructose Activities: in/out
 +
 
 +
=== Tuesday 1st September 2009 16:00 UTC ===
 +
 
 +
==== Logs ====
 +
[[Development Team/Meetings/Logs/September 01 2009]]
 +
 
 +
==== Topics ====
 +
 
 +
===== Release process =====
 +
 
 +
* Sascha: Schedule too tight for GSoC projects, no time for the review process.
 +
* Sascha: i think the release process is fine so far. code review could be improved, but we're already on it.
 +
* Tomeu: we have one pending feature freeze exceptions: Hamilton Chua has proposed that we merge his code for registering with a school server. It has already one +1, it needs one more.
 +
* Gary: feature freeze seemed a little 'slushy' this time, we still need to merge the new toolbars for some activities in Sucrose.
 +
* Aleksey: we missed the chance of having library.sl.o (or so) in 0.86 to share .xol/jobjects -- I think the problem is that we don't have an engineering committee. Aleksey will restart discussion on this in the mailing list.
 +
* Ben: the development mailing list is the engineering committee. I'm just trying to avoid the creation of more unnecessary committees, meeting, and IRC traffic.
 +
 
 +
===== Stabilization =====
 +
 
 +
* Gary: window layering bugs in our metacity usage block testing to some point
 +
* Tomeu: we'll have to go back to matchbox if we cannot fix that
 +
* Sascha: Issues with the Alt key
 +
* Ben: I think the most helpful thing would be to release up-to-date emulation images.
 +
* Simon: we need to organize the bug work: hold triaging sessions, fix bugs and produce images that people can test.
 +
* Ben: I think it should be a high priority for all bugs in trac to be correctly prioritized and targeted.
 +
* Ben: IMHO, our target should be "ready for deployment by OLPC to hundreds of thousands of children on the XO-1.5".
 +
* Simon: I would say - we need to propose a build on the ml and ask for testing
 +
* Tomeu: so we should update the rpms, several fixes landed since the last ones. I will do it tomorrow.
 +
* Thomas: I can help here via vmware and usb/sd testing have f12 edu spin on sd now
 +
* Simon: I will work with Gary on toolbars
 +
* Rafael: I'll help with testing, having the emulation images...
 +
* Ben: I think an official proclamation of a "Bug Hunt" on the mailing list would help, once we are ready.  Maybe with periodic updates as to who has discovered the most bugs, and who has killed the most? Almost like a competition.
 +
* Sascha: how about the doing a bug hunt contest and the winner gets their favourite feature in? ;)
 +
* Sebastian: one thing I'd like to raise is that we might need immediate packaging after 0.86 is out (since we might otherwise conflict with F12's feature freeze)
 +
 
 +
===== Journal view extensions =====
 +
 
 +
* Aleksey: would be extensions like the cp sections are and bundled like activities
 +
* Aleksey: deploy extensions like from ASLO, at the end
 +
* Benjamin: insecure, frame devices and control panel plugins are not designed to be easily modified, because they have tremendous system access.
 +
* Sascha: so what's the advantage of Journal plugins/extensions of activities interfacing directly with the data store?
 +
* Tomeu: time ran out, let's discuss code review and journal view extensions to the next week meeting
 +
 
 +
=== 28th August 2009 ===
 +
 
 +
==== Logs ====
 +
[[Development Team/Meetings/Logs/August 28 2009]]
 +
 
 +
==== Topics ====
 +
* Gonzalo Chevarria presented the project on which he works: http://cixosfia.libreusmp.org/
 +
* CIXOS-FIA is currently composed by 16 people and is organized in these groups: Web development, Python development, XO support, Volunteers and Logistics.
 +
* This group wants to work together in improving Sugar with other similar groups.
 +
* Has been proposed the creation of a mailing list to be used for development issues in spanish: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-desarrollo
 +
* A report about usage of the XO in Peru is going to be published very soon, issues will be reported to the OLPC and Sugar Labs bug trackers.
 +
 
 +
=== 2 July 2009 ===
 +
* [http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.minutes.20090702_1003.html Summary], [http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.log.20090702_1003.html log]
 +
 
 +
=== 18 June 2009 ===
 +
 
 +
* Topic: '''Sugarizing of Web apps (by Lucian Branescu Mihaila)'''
 +
* Calendar: [http://www.google.com/calendar/event?eid=YXNpcmFhaWZydm4zb2Z1NzU4bXVvYmhiaXNfMjAwOTA2MThUMTYwMDAwWiBoOWNmdWsxMDg5NGVtN2E4bW9lbXF1dXNtZ0Bn&ctz=America/New_York event]
 +
* [http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.minutes.20090618_1002.html Summary], [http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.log.20090618_1002.html log]
 +
 
 +
=== Thursday May 21 2009 - 16.15 (UTC) ===
 +
 
 +
==== Topics ====
 +
 
 +
* Jeff Elkner will present the Sugar Labs, DC project: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-May/005689.html
 +
* Packaging subteam, re:http://www.mail-archive.com/iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg04254.html
 +
 
 +
=== Thursday May 21 2009 - 14.00 (UTC) ===
 +
 
 +
==== Logs ====
 +
 
 +
[[Development Team/Meetings/Logs/May 21 2009]]
 +
 
 +
==== Topics ====
 +
0.86 roadmap discussion
 +
 
 +
=== Thursday February 26 2009 - 16.00 (UTC) ===
 +
 
 +
==== Topics ====
 +
a) Bug review.  What bugs are hot in the 0.84 release?
 +
 
 +
=== Thursday February 19 2009 - 14.00 (UTC) ===
 +
 
 +
==== Logs ====
 +
Summary: http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.20090219_0909.html
 +
 
 +
Transcript: http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.log.20090219_0909.html
  
−
==Meetings==
 
 
===Thursday January 22 2009 - 14.00 (UTC) ===
 
===Thursday January 22 2009 - 14.00 (UTC) ===
  
 
====Logs ====
 
====Logs ====
−
http://meeting.laptop.org/sugar-meeting.log.20090122_0921.html
+
http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.log.20090122_0921.html
  
 
====Topics====
 
====Topics====
−
a) February the 13th is the due date for our Sucrose 0.83 Release Candidate 1 ([[DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap#Schedule]]). What needs to happen in the next weeks to get there?
+
a) February the 13th is the due date for our Sucrose 0.83 Release Candidate 1 ([[Development Team/Release/Roadmap#Schedule]]). What needs to happen in the next weeks to get there?
 
   
 
   
−
b) Update [[DevelopmentTeam/TODO]] list
+
b) Update [[Development Team/TODO]] list
  
 
c) Auto-authentication for Browse when visiting web-based tools on the XS it has registered to (guest speaker Martin Langhoff)
 
c) Auto-authentication for Browse when visiting web-based tools on the XS it has registered to (guest speaker Martin Langhoff)
Line 39: Line 443:
 
===Thursday January 15 2009 - 15.00 (UTC) ===
 
===Thursday January 15 2009 - 15.00 (UTC) ===
 
====Logs ====
 
====Logs ====
−
http://meeting.laptop.org/sugar-meeting.log.20090115_1006.html
+
http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.log.20090115_1006.html
  
 
====Topics====
 
====Topics====
 
a) Feature freeze: are we ready? what next?
 
a) Feature freeze: are we ready? what next?
  
−
b) update [[DevelopmentTeam/TODO|TODO]] list
+
b) update [[Development Team/TODO|TODO]] list
  
 
c) How long to support "old" versions of Sugar (Debian lenny might ship 0.82)
 
c) How long to support "old" versions of Sugar (Debian lenny might ship 0.82)
 +
</div></div>
 +
 +
<div class="NavFrame collapsed"><div class="NavHead">
  
 +
==2008 Meetings==
 +
</div><div class="NavContent">
 
===Thursday December 11 2008 - 14.00 (UTC) ===
 
===Thursday December 11 2008 - 14.00 (UTC) ===
 
====Logs ====
 
====Logs ====
−
http://meeting.laptop.org/sugar-meeting.log.20081211_0903.html
+
http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.log.20081211_0903.html
  
 
====Topics====
 
====Topics====
Line 65: Line 474:
  
 
e) trac (add the needed milestones...)
 
e) trac (add the needed milestones...)
−
 
  
 
===Thursday November 13 2008 - 14.00 (UTC) ===
 
===Thursday November 13 2008 - 14.00 (UTC) ===
 
====Logs ====
 
====Logs ====
−
http://meeting.laptop.org/sugar-meeting.log.20081113_0945.html
+
http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting.log.20081113_0945.html
  
 
====Topics====
 
====Topics====
Line 119: Line 527:
  
 
====Topics====
 
====Topics====
−
===== Form the Sugarlabs Bugsquad =====
+
===== Form the Sugar Labs Bugsquad =====
−
At this meeting we want to form the Sugarlabs Bugsquad, the Quality Assurance (QA) team for Sugar. The squad keeps track of current bugs in the sugar software and try to make sure that major bugs do not go unnoticed by developers. You do not need any programming knowledge to be in the Bugsquad; in fact it is a great way to return something to the Sugar community if you cannot program.
+
At this meeting we want to form the Sugar Labs Bugsquad, the Quality Assurance (QA) team for Sugar. The squad keeps track of current bugs in the sugar software and try to make sure that major bugs do not go unnoticed by developers. You do not need any programming knowledge to be in the Bugsquad; in fact it is a great way to return something to the Sugar community if you cannot program.
  
 
The squad is modelled on the gnome bugsquad: http://developer.gnome.org/projects/bugsquad/  
 
The squad is modelled on the gnome bugsquad: http://developer.gnome.org/projects/bugsquad/  
Line 141: Line 549:
  
 
===== Roadmap =====
 
===== Roadmap =====
−
* keep on reviewing the list we have at [[DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap/0.84#Goals]]
+
* keep on reviewing the list we have at [[Development Team/Release/Roadmap/0.84#Goals]]
 
** assigned owners and peers to all groups
 
** assigned owners and peers to all groups
 
** started to assign owners to each feature
 
** started to assign owners to each feature
Line 156: Line 564:
  
 
===== Roadmap =====
 
===== Roadmap =====
−
* keep on reviewing the list we have at [[DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap/0.84#Goals]]
+
* keep on reviewing the list we have at [[Development Team/Release/Roadmap/0.84#Goals]]
  
 
===== Sugarbot =====
 
===== Sugarbot =====
Line 186: Line 594:
  
 
===== Roadmap =====
 
===== Roadmap =====
−
* review the list we have at [[DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap/0.84#Goals]]  
+
* review the list we have at [[Development Team/Release/Roadmap/0.84#Goals]]  
 
* do we finally agree on a 6 months cycle?
 
* do we finally agree on a 6 months cycle?
  
Line 202: Line 610:
  
 
===== Roadmap =====
 
===== Roadmap =====
−
What do we want to do for [[DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap/0.84]] ?
+
What do we want to do for [[Development Team/Release/Roadmap/0.84]] ?
 
* we aim for a 6 months cycle (another week to set this in stone)
 
* we aim for a 6 months cycle (another week to set this in stone)
−
* please add your points to this page [[DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap/0.84#Goals]] - we want to discuss these next week
+
* please add your points to this page [[Development Team/Release/Roadmap/0.84#Goals]] - we want to discuss these next week
  
 
===== Status of bugfixing =====
 
===== Status of bugfixing =====
Line 332: Line 740:
 
* introduction of new developers
 
* introduction of new developers
  
−
Additionally we have topics that can be decided by the developers. These can be added by the developers during the week. The complete process is described here: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Meetings#How_to_add_topics
+
Additionally we have topics that can be decided by the developers. These can be added by the developers during the week. The complete process is described here: [[Development Team/Meetings#How_to_add_topics]]
  
 
The mails:
 
The mails:
Line 345: Line 753:
 
** eben will make mockup by Aug 15 (http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7551)
 
** eben will make mockup by Aug 15 (http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7551)
 
** starting Aug 15 paulproteus will port the xisting UI to Eben's mockup.   
 
** starting Aug 15 paulproteus will port the xisting UI to Eben's mockup.   
−
** then he will send his code for review: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/CodeReview#Patch_submission
+
** then he will send his code for review: [[Development Team/Code Review#Patch_submission]]
 
** after review the feature can be included
 
** after review the feature can be included
 
* We will meet for a status update on the cc the 14th of August in the sugar dev meeting
 
* We will meet for a status update on the cc the 14th of August in the sugar dev meeting
Line 364: Line 772:
 
====Topics====
 
====Topics====
 
=====What let's left for the upcoming release=====
 
=====What let's left for the upcoming release=====
−
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap#Schedule
+
[[Development Team/Release/Roadmap#Schedule]]
  
 
=====Changes in the review process=====
 
=====Changes in the review process=====
−
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/CodeReview#Patch_submission
+
[[Development Team/Code Review#Patch_submission]]
  
  
Line 379: Line 787:
  
 
=====Update on the status of the ongoing features=====
 
=====Update on the status of the ongoing features=====
−
Looks very good: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap#New_features
+
[[Development Team/Release/Roadmap#New_features]]
  
 
=====How to announce a new release of an activity best?=====
 
=====How to announce a new release of an activity best?=====
Line 502: Line 910:
 
** do we make the same for the territory than what we do for the language?
 
** do we make the same for the territory than what we do for the language?
  
−
===Tuesday March 25 2008 ("TTL-meeting") exceptional time: 15.00 (UTC) ===
+
===Tuesday March 25 2008 ===
 +
("TTL-meeting") exceptional time: 15.00 (UTC)
 
====Logs ====
 
====Logs ====
 
http://dev.laptop.org/~erikos/sugar_meeting_Mar_25.log
 
http://dev.laptop.org/~erikos/sugar_meeting_Mar_25.log
Line 575: Line 984:
 
** [[Accessibility Line Based Interface]]
 
** [[Accessibility Line Based Interface]]
 
** [[Screen_Reader]]
 
** [[Screen_Reader]]
−
** [[Listen_and_Spell]]
+
** [[Activities/Listen Spell]]
  
 
===Tuesday March 18 2008 ("big")===
 
===Tuesday March 18 2008 ("big")===
Line 628: Line 1,037:
 
* Homunq, Develop, Guatemala (UTC-6)
 
* Homunq, Develop, Guatemala (UTC-6)
 
* morgs, presence, ZA
 
* morgs, presence, ZA
−
* [[User:Bert|bertf]], [[Etoys]], [[Germany]]
+
* [[User:Bert|bertf]], [[Activities/Etoys]], Germany
 
* erikos
 
* erikos
 
* tomeu
 
* tomeu
Line 703: Line 1,112:
 
** http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-February/004318.html
 
** http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-February/004318.html
 
* Ridderman is working on focus bugs in Sugar / GTK. Kind of a nuts and bolts bug - http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/2045
 
* Ridderman is working on focus bugs in Sugar / GTK. Kind of a nuts and bolts bug - http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/2045
−
 
+
</div></div>
 +
<div class="NavFrame collapsed"><div class="NavHead">
 +
==2007 Meetings==
 +
</div><div class="NavContent">
 
===Tuesday October 30 2007===
 
===Tuesday October 30 2007===
 
* http://dev.laptop.org/~erikos/sugar-dev-301007.log
 
* http://dev.laptop.org/~erikos/sugar-dev-301007.log
Line 763: Line 1,175:
 
   
 
   
 
* The branch/build procedure discussion is moved to the journal/tubes meeting
 
* The branch/build procedure discussion is moved to the journal/tubes meeting
−
 
+
</div></div>
−
 
 
−
[[Category:DevelopmentTeam]]
 
−
[[Category:Meeting minutes]]
 

Latest revision as of 16:29, 10 April 2018

Team Home   ·   Join   ·   Contacts   ·   Resources   ·   FAQ   ·   Roadmap   ·   To Do   ·   Meetings


Development Team Meetings

Who

The meeting is targeted to Sugar core and activity developers, but everyone interested is welcome to join. We try to open the development up a bit, make it more transparent and allow the community to participate easily.

Default Agenda

  • Quick update about what we have been working on and eventually the problems we have run into.
  • Discussion about the implementation details of tickets we are planning to work on. Figure out how to split up the work and who should be owning the various parts.
  • Questions from activity authors about specific aspects of the platform and more in general on how to better integrate their activity in Sugar. Report about problems they run into.
  • Help out new contributors to figure out where to start. Point out the tickets we need help with, discuss with them the implementation.

How to add to the agenda

Add the topics that you want to discuss during the week to the upcoming meeting. They will be collected during the week and seny out in the meeting announcement on Tuesday morning.

Upcoming Meetings

Tuesday 21:00 UTC

  • what we have been working on,

Previous Meetings

10th April 2018 21:00 UTC

minutes log summary

last planned update of this page, as no feedback was received.

3rd April 2018 21:00 UTC

minutes log summary

27th March 2018 21:00 UTC

minutes log summary

20th March 2018 21:00 UTC

minutes log summary

13th March 2018 21:00 UTC

minutes log summary

relevance canary; are you reading this? the regular updates here will cease in another four weeks unless there is some feedback; updates will continue on sugar-devel@ mailing list.

6th March 2018 22:00 UTC

minutes log summary

Topics:

what we have been working on
Music Blocks release, hosting. Reviewing patches. Replacement of Record activity. Porting to Six and Python 3. Porting activities to GTK+ 3 and Sugargame 1.2.
port to Python 3 and Six
expectations discussed, Q&A session, see summary and log.
general business
continuous integration, see summary and log.

27th February 2018 22:00 UTC

minutes log summary

Topics:

what we have been working on
Bugs in Music Blocks, Speak, Memorize. Porting activities to GTK+ 3 and Sugargame 1.2.
port to Python 3 and Six
plans made and discussed, see summary and log.
general business
see summary and log.

20th February 2018 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
testing Sugar on Ubuntu 18.04, testing and design of Music Blocks.

14th January 2018 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
quashing Music Blocks bugs, preparing tasks for GSoC, project mining, clean up activity metadata format, moved more of developer.sugarlabs.org over to GitHub.

30th January 2018 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
review patches, review activity NumRush, port Letters and Physics to Sugargame 1.2, a contributors page for web site, Music Blocks planet, preparing new release, pitch visualisation, Clock activity user documentation, and creating tasks for GSoC.

16th January 2018 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
fix startup delay in Sugargame, add ticking Clock, and a music blocks planet project moderation portal.
progress of GCI 2017
productive and enriching, last day today, opportunity for new activity maintainers to release contributed work.

9th January 2018 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
patch reviews, patch tests, measure and clock activities, music blocks in browse, teaching humanitarian free and open source software.
progress of GCI 2017
GTK+ 3 conversions, documentation updates.

2nd January 2018 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
reviewing patches, updating translations,
progress of GCI 2017
GTK+ 3 conversions,

19th December 2017 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
testing Sugar 0.112 on Fedora 18 and Ubuntu 18.04, answering questions on Sugar 0.112 release, a lot of bug fixes being reviewed.
progress of GCI 2017
students are starting to dig deeper, documentation for sugar-live-build has come together, some GTK+ 3 porting tasks coming up.

12th December 2017 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
Walter has been administering GCI 2017, and working on Music Blocks and Turtle Blocks. James has been reviewing pull requests, checking licensing, testing Sugar on Ubuntu 18.04 beta, releasing Speak-55 and Read-118.1, and fixed a Paint activity empty canvas.
progress of GCI 2017
Almost 400 students, how to make a pull request, some solid contributions, some new activities.
cross-platform development
There are broken JavaScript activities that don't run on Sugar desktop. Contributions are being wasted, and opportunity lost. We had a Cross-Platform environment. We have attracted JavaScript Web developers instead of JavaScript Cross-Platform developers. We need Cross-Platform developers to merge the diverged libraries, and apply Cross-Platform practices to both libraries and activities.

5th December 2017 22:00 UTC

Only one developer was available, so the meeting did not happen.

28th November 2017 22:00 UTC

Only one developer was available, so the meeting did not happen.

21st November 2017 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
Abdul has been working on an activity for Sugarizer. Walter has been working on Google Code-in preparation and released Music Blocks 2.2. James has been testing Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic in a VM, Fedora 27 SoaS on Raspberry Pi, and plans to write guidance for pull requests by GCI contestants.

14th November 2017 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
About 308 GCI tasks have been defined privately by the mentors, Music Blocks source code has been prepared for GCI, Sugar Software Update has been tested; a rogue Browse-157.4 bundle was found, several GitHub issues cleaned in preparation for GCI.

7th November 2017 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
preparing for GCI, merged several translation pull requests, began looking into why Sugar POT file is generated differently, released and tested Browse 201.3 native, reviewed Paraguay's build of sugar, reviewed Arch Linux packaging of Sugar, thinking of updating a beginners guide, merging www-sugar, and Music Blocks.

31st October 2017 21:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
nothing in particular.
how to encourage testing of Fedora packagers' work
Thomas and Frederick found fail-to-start problems in Fedora 27, as the Sugar and Browse packages had not been tested at all, so we all need to test the work of our downstream packagers, and help them where possible.

24th October 2017 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
updating examples and testing of Music Blocks, testing new WebKit GTK+ with Browse, looking for source code commits for the FindWords-3.1 activity, and releasing MusicKeyboard-11.

17th October 2017 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

what we have been working on
features in Music Blocks, assessing GTK+ 3 porting, preparing for and merging translations,
impact of GTK+ 2 removal in Fedora and Debian
GTK+ is a library, see GTK+ and GTK+, GTK+ 3 is incompatible with GTK+ 2, many activities for Sugar depend on GTK+ 2, GTK+ 2 is scheduled for removal in Fedora 28 and in Debian Buster, removal already starting in Debian, bad user experience with Browse and activities.sugarlabs.org is non-starting activities, all Fructose activities are converted, Labyrinth is of interest to OLPC and has an upstream port, Record is of interest to OLPC and has an in-progress port at https://github.com/quozl/record-activity/tree/gtk3, Moon is of interest to OLPC and has a JavaScript port, GCI will have porting tasks.

10th October 2017 22:00 UTC

Only one developer was available, so the meeting did not happen.

Topics:

post-release 0.112 review
no test reports received.
what we have been working on
new gst-plugins-espeak, contributors list, releasing, testing 0.112, font size in Terminal, bugs in gst-plugins-espeak.

Report was made by mail.

3rd October 2017 22:00 UTC

Only one developer was available, so the meeting did not happen.

Topics:

progress of testing 0.111
going well, and a bootable build is available.
merging any translations
no new translations, so no need for merge.
readiness for 0.112
release notes are complete, nothing is blocking release on 9th October.
what we have been working on
Memorize and Speak activities do fail to start on Ubuntu 17.04 Artful due to default voice missing from espeak, since fixed in gst-plugins-espeak. sugar-docs has been updated for using sugar-live-build as a development environment, and remove sugar-build. The AbiWord fix for #4915 Write activity flicker has been accepted by Ubuntu and Debian, and has tested fine in those distributions. Also on GitHub have been commits in embedded Music Blocks, embedded Turtle Blocks, Help, and ImageViewer.

Report was made by mail.

26 September 2017 22:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

progress of testing 0.111
some testing is being done, but more testing would be helpful, see testing 0.111,
merging latest translations
asked translators mailing list, no new translations made, strings for save-as feature are new, some Music Blocks strings changed too,
readiness for 0.112
some time before translations must be in per schedule, release process well understood and should not take long, possibility of a test image,
what we have been working on
bug #4915 ("Write redraws excessively - heats my lap") the AbiWord flicker, a fix is available, but upstream wants it also fixed on Wayland, though Ubuntu has taken it, applying the fix is straightfoward; release notes are to include Turtle Blocks porting, and therefore other activities (done, see 0.112#Notes), Turtle Blocks 216 for upload (done), and a test image is nearly complete, which can be a replacement for sugar-build, see Sugar Live Build.

19 September 2017 21:00 UTC

minutes log

Topics:

Release Manager
We ack'd James Cameron in his role as release manager for 0.112.
Community Standards
We reiterated the importance of civil behavior and the necessity to work with the community, not unilaterally. We also reviewed the mechanisms we use for pull requests, reviews, and merging.
0.112 release testing
We discussed 0.112/Testing
Version numbering
We agreed to investigate the possibility of switching to 113 for the next release (a monotonic numbering system).
ALSOv3
We agreed to work with SCG to do the ground work necessary to get ALSOv3 launched.

30 October 2010 22:00 UTC

minutes, log

Not discussed:

  • Settle down patch submitting workflow:
    • email based workflow as a primarily model (check other FOSS projects to gather all existed experience) alsroot 07:35, 27 October 2010 (EDT)
    • write an email-bot/trac-plugin to make an email<->trac sync. Will be useful, e.g., for non-developers who track bugs status and to let people know the current status in most convenient way. All emails, w/ ticket set, will be posted to bugs.sl.o and any comments(and patches) to bugs.sl.o, to tickets w/ previously sent patches, will be emailed. alsroot 07:35, 27 October 2010 (EDT)
  • Requirement to use pylint/pep8 in git pre-commit:
    • sugar-lint, because it is a standalone project and can be used as-is also, e.g., for activities (i.e., as unified lint tool within sugar doers) alsroot 07:39, 27 October 2010 (EDT)
  • Increase a level of trust within core team, make patch reviewing workflow more clear:
    • Any committer, to a particular core project, might be a reviewer (we either should trust all these people or drop them from committer list) alsroot 07:59, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
    • To accept regular (reviewer decides whether patches are regular or not, of course, better to discuss it with other committers if there are doubts) patches, only one reviewer is needed alsroot 07:59, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
    • Non-regular patches should be formed in Features. These patches might take several tens of K. This is by design; that it is hard not only to develop, but also to review and it should involve several committers for a reasonable amount of time. alsroot 09:28, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
    • Review process should not include debates about coding style, if coding style conforms to lint checks and Hacking Policy (if it has unequivocal statements, needs to be rechecked), it should be applied alsroot 09:33, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
    • Purism is good but there is no need to achieve it by single patch, it might be changed in post-commit patches if second reviewer (e.g., looking to the patch thread on mailing list) found an issue in already commited code. alsroot 13:39, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
  • officially dropping support for 0.86? (e.g. #1838)
    • do we need to discuss thing like that on Development Team meeting, is it a more appropriate task for Deployment and Platform teams? alsroot 07:59, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
  • big (and small) ideas for 0.92 --Walter 13:17, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
  • Support isolated start of glucose components. In that case, merge sugar-base to sugar-toolkit (patches [yet] don't implement it but import sugar-base from sugar-toolkit) to have API that will be used as a single access point to sugar core functionality for activities. alsroot 08:12, 30 October 2010 (EDT)

Wednesday 30 June 2010 13:00 UTC

minutes, log

  • Introduction: the release cycle approach
  • Define the overall goal for 0.90
  • Review processes (review, Feature)
  • Open positions (development team, design team, testing team)

Monday 22 March 2010 14:00 UTC

minutes, log.

  • Welcome newcomers
  • 0.88 Release: hard code freeze, final release, 0.88.1

Monday 8 March 2010 14:00 UTC

minutes, log.

  • backport SL#1787 to 0.86, push out + announce new release
  • 0.88 Release: bug database cleanup, code review, stabilization, etc

Monday 22 February 2010 14:00 UTC

minutes, log.

  • 0.88 Release: bug database cleanup, fix bugs, etc
  • Activity Team: Move to new toolbar

Monday 8 February 2010 14:00 UTC

Logs

logs

minutes

Topics

  • State of 0.88 release
Retrieved from "https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Development_Team/Meetings&oldid=101690"