Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

  • 19 KB (3,350 words) - 23:23, 1 March 2011
  • :'''<ChristophD>''' bernie, what about the Beagle board?
    36 KB (6,435 words) - 23:22, 1 March 2011
  • == Oversight Board Meeting Log 2009-11-13 ==
    9 KB (1,551 words) - 23:27, 1 March 2011
  • ...ill make it clearer, we're trying to avoid to replicate the governance and oversight structures locally :'''walterbender''': Icarito-d234: but the governance and oversight you need for your contract are vastly different than the structure at the S
    25 KB (4,043 words) - 15:32, 2 December 2011
  • ...ions, btw. Most of the board members here (myself included) have only been board members for... about 10 days now, so we're still learning on the job. ...d it's the first time board membership has transitioned - we're the second board.)
    30 KB (4,493 words) - 23:25, 1 March 2011
  • [[Category:Oversight board]]
    22 KB (4,017 words) - 23:27, 1 March 2011
  • ...t the record show that SL greatly appreciates the efforts of our departing board members :'''<mchua>''' and the efforts of our returning board members as well. :)
    34 KB (6,098 words) - 23:23, 1 March 2011
  • 312 bytes (43 words) - 23:34, 1 March 2011
  • :'''<walterbender>''' so I would propose it be ONLY board members, out ombudsman, and a representaive of SFC. :'''<CanoeBerry>''' Who has long-term access to the archives? All futures board members and all future ombuds?
    24 KB (4,258 words) - 23:30, 1 March 2011
  • 19 KB (3,336 words) - 23:29, 1 March 2011
  • :'''<cjb>''' they say you can *only* start a team if you can find a board member to sit on it, or something ...osite of our decision panel rules; rather than requiring no members of the board, they require at least one
    28 KB (5,081 words) - 23:24, 1 March 2011
  • 42 KB (7,435 words) - 15:57, 15 September 2011
  • ...your motion, I am in agreement (seconded) and we could circulate it to the board by email ...we *do* change our mind quickly, I suggest that everyone votes us off the board and finds people who are willing to work out how they feel about something
    65 KB (11,595 words) - 23:32, 1 March 2011
  • :'''<tomeu>''' cjb: well, gnome's board uses to talk about it quite regularly
    21 KB (3,691 words) - 23:32, 1 March 2011
  • 23 KB (3,976 words) - 23:35, 1 March 2011
  • == Oversight Board meeting log 2009-08-28 ==
    15 KB (2,634 words) - 18:27, 16 August 2014
  • ...ing simple and inviting for FOSS projects while maintaining some degree of oversight (as required by TM law and by our community standards)
    24 KB (3,805 words) - 00:11, 2 March 2011
  • <walterbender> I think it is time to gear up for an election to vote in a new board that actually is interested in participating. ...ats on meeting attendance over the past few years by some of our long-time board members... it won't be pretty :P
    24 KB (3,900 words) - 17:16, 5 October 2018
  • 6 KB (998 words) - 16:30, 7 September 2018
  • ...nd then meet in Boston as well... we should be able to get everyone on the board in the room at the same time :)
    24 KB (4,291 words) - 00:20, 2 March 2011
  • :'''<ClaudiaU>''' the link you just sent me... "The Oversight board will be holding regular bi-weekly meetings on Fridays at 15 UTC on irc.free
    10 KB (1,694 words) - 23:59, 1 March 2011
  • ...questions and some commentary, with Paul acting as a liason to the Fedora Board. :#info Question from the Fedora Board: Does SL currently own the SoaS trademark?
    28 KB (4,841 words) - 00:07, 2 March 2011
  • :'''<sdziallas>''' Once that is given, one may approach the Board for "trademark approval". :'''<sdziallas>''' Not receiving "technical approval" can be escalated to the board.
    23 KB (4,059 words) - 23:56, 1 March 2011
  • ...anDaly: I guess one way of saying this is that I don't feel like you're on-board with the draft, and that makes me not want to waste more time working on it
    29 KB (5,133 words) - 00:05, 2 March 2011
  • :I was going to ask the board to pre-approve a budget of $3000 for the infrastructure, which I'll use onl
    28 KB (4,897 words) - 23:57, 1 March 2011
  • 18 KB (3,215 words) - 00:21, 2 March 2011
  • ...we have any decisions to make today, but I want to make sure people on the board have a heads up as to what is going on... lots.
    31 KB (5,392 words) - 00:17, 2 March 2011
  • 31 KB (5,437 words) - 00:08, 2 March 2011
  • 18 KB (3,098 words) - 00:24, 2 March 2011
  • ...r>''' the question, related to Topic 3 today, is the degree of control and oversight we want to administer
    17 KB (3,011 words) - 00:25, 2 March 2011
  • ...deployment experience, therefore I could represent deployments within the board. ...nie>''' ideally, I'd like a real deplyment person such as rgs to be on the board instead of me.
    26 KB (4,635 words) - 00:23, 2 March 2011
  • 10 KB (1,643 words) - 00:29, 2 March 2011
  • 12 KB (2,113 words) - 00:15, 2 March 2011
  • <walterbender> I think it is time to gear up for an election to vote in a new board that actually is interested in participating. ...ats on meeting attendance over the past few years by some of our long-time board members... it won't be pretty :P
    26 KB (3,985 words) - 18:18, 2 November 2018
  • ...s evident, but from talking to them the main reason is that members of the board have undermined decisions after they have been made, which brings into doub ...s, whining to SFC is counter-productive; it's undermining the right of the board to deliberate.
    22 KB (3,135 words) - 00:13, 5 January 2019
  • [08:00:34] <walterbender> welcome to the last SL oversight board meeting of 2019. [08:38:41] <Quozl> ultimately, the board is responsible for the content.
    30 KB (4,101 words) - 10:08, 8 December 2018
  • :'''<walterbender>''' cjb: is it reasonable to ask that each board member write a brief position statement? :'''<bernie>''' cjb: I'm happy to run the specs through the board again, but couldn't we delegate the technical details?
    37 KB (6,610 words) - 00:12, 2 March 2011
  • :'''<walter__>''' (3) administrative and technical oversight (we need it from somewhere) ...OLPC would assign someone to fill in as an acting member of the oversight board
    33 KB (5,891 words) - 09:29, 1 March 2011
  • :'''<marcopg>''' cjb is on the board for olpc right? :'''<marcopg>''' erikos: not that this board is only temporary
    43 KB (7,925 words) - 09:34, 1 March 2011
  • :'''<walter>''' the list of nominees for the oversight committee :'''<erikos>''' There was consensus that we begin with just Oversight and Members committees.
    40 KB (7,584 words) - 09:37, 1 March 2011
  • ...gether an agenda in the wiki: http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Oversight Board/Minutes#Friday_5_September_2008_-_14.00_.28UTC.29 ...cratic issues first, as this is the first meeting of the elected Oversight Board
    26 KB (4,781 words) - 09:30, 1 March 2011
  • ...he only outstanding issue is getting the agreement signed by the oversight board :'''<walter_>''' My definition would be to run the board meetings and be the point of last recourse.
    39 KB (7,263 words) - 09:35, 1 March 2011
  • :'''<marcopg>''' we could also discuss on the board list I guess :'''<walter>''' Alas, the PR firm I tried to bring on board cannot do it. I'll keep looking.
    25 KB (4,703 words) - 09:37, 1 March 2011
  • :'''<walter>''' I think there is no harm in everyone on the oversight board getting that email. :'''<dfarning_>''' hey aleph_6510 thanks for helping _bernie on the beagle board
    29 KB (5,188 words) - 09:35, 1 March 2011
  • :'''<tomeu>''' dfarning: I guess all board members should vote?
    19 KB (3,544 words) - 09:30, 1 March 2011
  • ...lve, is to have the global Sugar Labs in the loop when new regions come on board. :'''<walter_>''' I should make local meetings explicit in the MOU... it is an oversight.
    24 KB (4,340 words) - 09:37, 1 March 2011

Page text matches

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)